Milk is the first food we taste. It is therefore associated with comfort and strength. We live in a milk consuming society where infants, adolescents, and adults drink milk. Milk sales reach eleven billion dollars annually in the United States alone (McDougall). Incredible advertising campaigns, such as “got milk? ” portray celebrities and beautiful, healthy people who ensure us that milk is essentially good for us. In 1999 alone, this campaign cost one hundred and thirty million dollars and raised sales by 0. 7 percent (Nestle 79).
Other forms of advertising for milk and its imperative importance in our daily lives, include page long ads constructed as articles on accredited magazines, such as The New York Times, claiming for a health crisis due to lack of calcium. Also, our nutritionist tell us it is the essential source for calcium and the FDA in its Pyramid Guide suggests at least two to three servings of dairy daily, while the Dairy Counsel suggests three to four. An important factor in milk consumption is the United States is the Dairy Management Inc.
Their sole purpose is to build a marketing plan for dairy, raising the consumer demand for all of their products. They count with a budget of over one hundred and sixty five million dollars a year, which enables them to target any major consumption group (McDougall). A great part of their budget is used for research that tries to demonstrate some benefits of dairy consumption. They are responsible to give the consumer confidence on the importance of milk to achieve maximum health capacitycontract law.
They do this by emphasizing the main reasons why people do drink milk. Other than a genuine liking, most Americans drink milk as a source of calcium and protein. Calcium is a concerning topic to most Americans because there is a cumulative desire for strong bones that can fight osteoporosis. However, is milk really a good source of Calcium? Does it help fight osteoporosis? Research shows that dairy actually disrupts the absorption of calcium. Also, the excessive amounts of protein present in milk are actually a major cause for osteoporosis.
This was shown in a in a study that proves how Eskimos have an estimated protein intake of about 25 percent of their daily intake. This is exceptionally high. Also, they have a very high calcium ingestion of around 2,500 milligrams a day. The study revealed this is the reason why their osteoporosis is among the worst in the world (Kradjian). These are the results because protein causes bone loss and the calcium in dairy cannot be properly absorbed, it gives virtually no protection (Benschoten).
One of the most important aspects of milk and its effects on the consumer is how osteoporosis became present in human beings. Most of us study in history class how our ancestors reflected great strength and muscularity. This is because studies on the bony remains of our ancestors indicate that there was a total absence of osteoporosis (Kradjian). Because we have the same gene programming of our ancestors, osteoporosis now found in our gene make up must be accredited to something external. Our ancestors used milk strictly as a nutrient for new-borns.
It was given by lactating mothers to their children. This is because human milk is very different from a cow’s milk. It is not surprising to hear then that cow’s milk has three to four times more protein than human’s milk. Also, a mother’s milk has six to ten times more essential fatty acids, very much needed and lacking in cow’s milk (Kradjian). Therefore, the milk of each mammal varies immensely because it is designed specifically for them. In actuality, humans are the only mammals that continue to drink milk beyond that lactating stage (Nestle 79).
Because it is considered a topic of public interest, many articles have been published in medical archives dealing with milk and its overwhelming consumption. However, these articles do anything but give a consumer confidence in drinking a glass of milk. Dr. Kradjian states the following on a letter he wrote to all his patients about milk consumption and his personal examination of such articles: They were only slightly less than horrifying. First of all, none of the authors spoke of cow's milk as an excellent food, free of side effects and the 'perfect food' as we have been led to believe by the industry.
The main focus of the published reports seems to be on intestinal colic, intestinal irritation, intestinal bleeding, anemia, allergic reactions in infants and children as well as infections such as salmonella. More ominous is the fear of viral infection with bovine leukemia virus or an AIDS-like virus as well as concern for childhood diabetes. Contamination of milk by blood and white (pus) cells as well as a variety of chemicals and insecticides was also discussed… Many of these diseases can be accredited to the drugs that are found in milk.
Today’s cows produce twenty five times more pounds of milk a year than twenty five years ago (Kradjian). This was achieved by giving the cows drugs, hormones, antibiotics, and forced feeding plans. When the FDA tested milk using very lenient standards, their data showed that fifty one percent of the samples had drug traces. This is why dairy products have been among the most recalled foods by the FDA due to contamination (McDougall). Unfortunately, today, this has even affected mothers’ milk, which can now be infected with pesticides (Kradjian).
Pesticide residues are an important subject because they are directly linked to cancer and chronic fatigue. Also, hormone residues are easily found in milk. This is due to the increase of hormone injections in cows to increase the potential for milk production. Today, cows are lactated even when pregnant. Therefore, the hormones found in milk today are higher than ever (Willett 167). These hormones have been linked to menstrual problems, osteoporosis, and prostate, breast, and colon cancers.
However, these hormonal residues are not the only reason that milk is linked to prostate and breast cancers. In nine studies, milk was found to be the number one dietary factor in prostate cancer because of its high levels of calcium and saturated fats. Breast cancer has been linked to the consumption of full-fat dairy products, and milk’s high levels of galactose, a simple sugar that is released in the digestion of milk, can damage the ovaries leading to ovarian cancer. Because of these saturated fats, milk contains lots of calories.
If we actually had the three serving recommended by the Food Pyramid, we would consume twenty five percent of the daily required calories. This can be cut only a small percentage by drinking low fat milk. This is because it is really not low fat. In actuality, low fat milk contains from twenty four to thirty three percent fat as calories. The “two percent fat” labeling is really referring to its weight (Kradjian). These fats, when digested, are stored as body fat and are also associated with heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension.
This is why there are six times more heart attacks in milk drinkers (Benschoten). Another concerning topic about milk is the bovine leukemia virus, which is found in eighty percent of all dairy herd in the United States. During pasteurization, these viruses are broken down. However, pasteurization is not always done correctly and new studies have shown that these fragments may even become more dangerous (McDougall). Bovine Leukemia virus is important because it has been directly related to HIV. Milk has also been linked to the developing of milk antibodies in the blood of diabetic children.
That is, when children consume milk and their intestinal tracts are still immature, the protein found in the milk can enter directly to the blood stream, where antibodies to milk are then formed. Unfortunately, these antibodies also attack the cells that produce insulin in the pancreas. If a child then drinks high quantities of milk, or milk containing foods, the child may destroy his own pancreas and is left with diabetes. Because of this The American Academy of Pediatrics now issues warnings regarding milk consumption and the development of Type 1 Diabetes in children (McDougall).
Other forms of advertising for milk and its imperative importance in our daily lives, include page long ads constructed as articles on accredited magazines, such as The New York Times, claiming for a health crisis due to lack of calcium. Also, our nutritionist tell us it is the essential source for calcium and the FDA in its Pyramid Guide suggests at least two to three servings of dairy daily, while the Dairy Counsel suggests three to four. An important factor in milk consumption is the United States is the Dairy Management Inc.
Their sole purpose is to build a marketing plan for dairy, raising the consumer demand for all of their products. They count with a budget of over one hundred and sixty five million dollars a year, which enables them to target any major consumption group (McDougall). A great part of their budget is used for research that tries to demonstrate some benefits of dairy consumption. They are responsible to give the consumer confidence on the importance of milk to achieve maximum health capacitycontract law.
They do this by emphasizing the main reasons why people do drink milk. Other than a genuine liking, most Americans drink milk as a source of calcium and protein. Calcium is a concerning topic to most Americans because there is a cumulative desire for strong bones that can fight osteoporosis. However, is milk really a good source of Calcium? Does it help fight osteoporosis? Research shows that dairy actually disrupts the absorption of calcium. Also, the excessive amounts of protein present in milk are actually a major cause for osteoporosis.
This was shown in a in a study that proves how Eskimos have an estimated protein intake of about 25 percent of their daily intake. This is exceptionally high. Also, they have a very high calcium ingestion of around 2,500 milligrams a day. The study revealed this is the reason why their osteoporosis is among the worst in the world (Kradjian). These are the results because protein causes bone loss and the calcium in dairy cannot be properly absorbed, it gives virtually no protection (Benschoten).
One of the most important aspects of milk and its effects on the consumer is how osteoporosis became present in human beings. Most of us study in history class how our ancestors reflected great strength and muscularity. This is because studies on the bony remains of our ancestors indicate that there was a total absence of osteoporosis (Kradjian). Because we have the same gene programming of our ancestors, osteoporosis now found in our gene make up must be accredited to something external. Our ancestors used milk strictly as a nutrient for new-borns.
It was given by lactating mothers to their children. This is because human milk is very different from a cow’s milk. It is not surprising to hear then that cow’s milk has three to four times more protein than human’s milk. Also, a mother’s milk has six to ten times more essential fatty acids, very much needed and lacking in cow’s milk (Kradjian). Therefore, the milk of each mammal varies immensely because it is designed specifically for them. In actuality, humans are the only mammals that continue to drink milk beyond that lactating stage (Nestle 79).
Because it is considered a topic of public interest, many articles have been published in medical archives dealing with milk and its overwhelming consumption. However, these articles do anything but give a consumer confidence in drinking a glass of milk. Dr. Kradjian states the following on a letter he wrote to all his patients about milk consumption and his personal examination of such articles: They were only slightly less than horrifying. First of all, none of the authors spoke of cow's milk as an excellent food, free of side effects and the 'perfect food' as we have been led to believe by the industry.
The main focus of the published reports seems to be on intestinal colic, intestinal irritation, intestinal bleeding, anemia, allergic reactions in infants and children as well as infections such as salmonella. More ominous is the fear of viral infection with bovine leukemia virus or an AIDS-like virus as well as concern for childhood diabetes. Contamination of milk by blood and white (pus) cells as well as a variety of chemicals and insecticides was also discussed… Many of these diseases can be accredited to the drugs that are found in milk.
Today’s cows produce twenty five times more pounds of milk a year than twenty five years ago (Kradjian). This was achieved by giving the cows drugs, hormones, antibiotics, and forced feeding plans. When the FDA tested milk using very lenient standards, their data showed that fifty one percent of the samples had drug traces. This is why dairy products have been among the most recalled foods by the FDA due to contamination (McDougall). Unfortunately, today, this has even affected mothers’ milk, which can now be infected with pesticides (Kradjian).
Pesticide residues are an important subject because they are directly linked to cancer and chronic fatigue. Also, hormone residues are easily found in milk. This is due to the increase of hormone injections in cows to increase the potential for milk production. Today, cows are lactated even when pregnant. Therefore, the hormones found in milk today are higher than ever (Willett 167). These hormones have been linked to menstrual problems, osteoporosis, and prostate, breast, and colon cancers.
However, these hormonal residues are not the only reason that milk is linked to prostate and breast cancers. In nine studies, milk was found to be the number one dietary factor in prostate cancer because of its high levels of calcium and saturated fats. Breast cancer has been linked to the consumption of full-fat dairy products, and milk’s high levels of galactose, a simple sugar that is released in the digestion of milk, can damage the ovaries leading to ovarian cancer. Because of these saturated fats, milk contains lots of calories.
If we actually had the three serving recommended by the Food Pyramid, we would consume twenty five percent of the daily required calories. This can be cut only a small percentage by drinking low fat milk. This is because it is really not low fat. In actuality, low fat milk contains from twenty four to thirty three percent fat as calories. The “two percent fat” labeling is really referring to its weight (Kradjian). These fats, when digested, are stored as body fat and are also associated with heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension.
This is why there are six times more heart attacks in milk drinkers (Benschoten). Another concerning topic about milk is the bovine leukemia virus, which is found in eighty percent of all dairy herd in the United States. During pasteurization, these viruses are broken down. However, pasteurization is not always done correctly and new studies have shown that these fragments may even become more dangerous (McDougall). Bovine Leukemia virus is important because it has been directly related to HIV. Milk has also been linked to the developing of milk antibodies in the blood of diabetic children.
That is, when children consume milk and their intestinal tracts are still immature, the protein found in the milk can enter directly to the blood stream, where antibodies to milk are then formed. Unfortunately, these antibodies also attack the cells that produce insulin in the pancreas. If a child then drinks high quantities of milk, or milk containing foods, the child may destroy his own pancreas and is left with diabetes. Because of this The American Academy of Pediatrics now issues warnings regarding milk consumption and the development of Type 1 Diabetes in children (McDougall).
No comments:
Post a Comment